Hush money trial to hear opening statements

Chris Michael

Well, after all the appeals and bombast and tears, it’s finally here: opening statements in the first criminal trial of a US president.

Jury selection in the case of the People of the State of New York versus Donald Trump wrapped up last week, though not without some difficulty. Hundreds of prospective jurors were dismissed, several cried, and a couple of them quit after they were chosen.

But at last judge Juan Merchan has landed on 18 people (12 jurors and six alternates) living in Manhattan who say they don’t have strong enough opinions about Donald Trump to bias them against the facts.

And facts there are aplenty. Prosecutors accuse Trump of falsifying business records in order to cover up an attempt to influence the 2016 election. Specifically, they say he tried right before that election – at a time when was already facing serious heat because of the Access Hollywood tape, in which he bragged he could sexually assault women because he was famous – to buy the silence of a porn star, Stormy Daniels, who says she had an affair with him 10 years before.

Prosecutors say Trump feared yet another sex scandal could sink his election prospects, so he paid her to keep silent about the affair, his coercive behavior in the bedroom, and of course his “toadstool”.

It’s going to be edifying. We’re at the courthouse. Stay with us.

Share

Updated at 

Key events

Chris Michael

Chris Michael

If there’s enough time in the day (court may wrap around 2pm today because of Passover), the trial could see its first witness.

This is expected to be David Pecker, the CEO of American Media Inc (AMI), which publishes the National Enquirer.

Pecker will be asked about his alleged deals with Trump to “catch and kill” negative stories by buying them from people and then not publishing them, in order to save Trump the bad publicity before the 2016 election.

For example, there’s the Trump Tower doorman who said he heard Trump fathered a child with one of his employees (a story that turned out to be false but the National Enquirer bought anyway, to kill it).

And there’s the model Karen McDougal, who said she had a 10-month affair with Trump while his wife, Melania, was pregnant with his son Barron (though the judge has ruled that the prosecution cannot mention that little titbit). AMI paid McDougal $150,000 to stay quiet.

In a twist, AMI actually decided not to pay Stormy Daniels for her story, baulking at her $120,000 asking price. That’s why it was left to Trump’s fixer Cohen to make the payments ($130,000 in the end) directly to her attorney. History turns on such things.

Share

Updated at 

Chris Michael

Chris Michael

Next up most likely would be opening statements.

The prosecution will likely try to frame the trial not as a sex scandal, but as another case of Trump’s attempts to interfere with elections. After all, that’s what they argues elevates this case to a felony: the prosecution say Trump falsified business records (normally a misdemeanour) in order to violate US campaign finance law (a federal crime).

Politico also reports that people close to the case say the prosecution will be working hard to “rehabilitate the credibility” of Michael Cohen – Trump’s former fixer, who already served time for his role in the hush-money payments, but who has also previously been found guilty of lying in court. Luckily for them, there is a fair amount of evidence to corroborate Cohen’s central claim: that he paid Stormy Daniels at Trump’s behest.

The defense, for their part, will be trying to downplay the events as a sordid but forgivable case of trying to hide an affair, which doesn’t rise to the level of a federal crime. They’ll also likely pile on Cohen’s own shady history in order to throw doubt on his claim that he discussed the deal with Trump in the Oval Office in 2017.

Trump himself may or may not testify. The one thing we know he’ll definitely do, however, is pitch the trial every day in the courthouse corridors to anyone who will listen as a “Biden-inspired witch hunt” – evidence that he sees two juries: the 12 people in the courthouse and the 160 million-plus American voters, who, let’s remember, could still elect him even if he’s convicted.

Share

Updated at 

What’s happening today?

Chris Michael

Chris Michael

Likely to come first is what’s known as a “Sandoval” decision. Here, the judge rules in advance about what prosecutors are allowed to ask Trump if he takes the stand – helping Trump decide whether to do so. (He has said he would, but signs indicate he may not.)

In this case, prosecutors have asked the judge for several things, such as permission to ask Trump about the two civil fraud trials he just lost: one for defaming E Jean Carroll after she accused him of raping her, which a judge ruled was “substantially true”, and the other for fradulently inflating the value of his properties.

They also want to grill him, among other matters, about criticism from a judge in a different case that Trump didn’t seem to be a truthful witness. Colour us shocked.

Share

Updated at 

Chris Michael

Chris Michael

So: who are those jurors?

It’s understandable that you’d be interested. So are we. And there is some limited information about them here:

But many media outlets seem determined to doxx (or reveal the identity and personal information, like addresses) of the jurors.

This would likely expose them to threats and abuse from Trump’s legions of fans, even without him telling them to.

So curiosity is normal. But given Merchan has unusually decided not to sequester the jury (often standard procedure in such high-profile trials), perhaps it’s best to give these people a little privacy, too.

Share

Updated at 

Hush money trial to hear opening statements

Chris Michael

Chris Michael

Well, after all the appeals and bombast and tears, it’s finally here: opening statements in the first criminal trial of a US president.

Jury selection in the case of the People of the State of New York versus Donald Trump wrapped up last week, though not without some difficulty. Hundreds of prospective jurors were dismissed, several cried, and a couple of them quit after they were chosen.

But at last judge Juan Merchan has landed on 18 people (12 jurors and six alternates) living in Manhattan who say they don’t have strong enough opinions about Donald Trump to bias them against the facts.

And facts there are aplenty. Prosecutors accuse Trump of falsifying business records in order to cover up an attempt to influence the 2016 election. Specifically, they say he tried right before that election – at a time when was already facing serious heat because of the Access Hollywood tape, in which he bragged he could sexually assault women because he was famous – to buy the silence of a porn star, Stormy Daniels, who says she had an affair with him 10 years before.

Prosecutors say Trump feared yet another sex scandal could sink his election prospects, so he paid her to keep silent about the affair, his coercive behavior in the bedroom, and of course his “toadstool”.

It’s going to be edifying. We’re at the courthouse. Stay with us.

Share

Updated at 



Source link